Another thing is the 2 witnesses rule.
Impossible for that to go away. They follow it through and through all the way up. They cant",, and will ""NEHHVer change "" this one. Impossible.
i am thinking that the "ten year plan" that some have spoken of is the most likely scenario.
the org.
has to both attract new members and retain as many existing ones as possible.. so i think they will let the recent changes "bed in" for a while, maybe a year ?
Another thing is the 2 witnesses rule.
Impossible for that to go away. They follow it through and through all the way up. They cant",, and will ""NEHHVer change "" this one. Impossible.
i am thinking that the "ten year plan" that some have spoken of is the most likely scenario.
the org.
has to both attract new members and retain as many existing ones as possible.. so i think they will let the recent changes "bed in" for a while, maybe a year ?
1914 is the cornerstone to the JW Borg theology..
Without that,,Christ could not have came down and,,inspected all the religions and chosen the International Bible Students Association as Gods channel in 1919.
You hear these governing bodys doubling down on 607BCE as the fall of Jerusalem to Babylon as it lines up with their ideology.
the changing teachings of jehovah's witnesses .
menacingmistral writes:.
"jehovah's witnesses often, not only change 180° from what they used to teach, they change from things they vehemently asserted were absolute truth.
Man made.
People don't give in to their doubts or give up because of the ''sunk cost fallacy"
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
....actually it was the Rutherford era,,, Knorr then via the Fraz era when they really began doubling down and putting the screws to its members.
Like tough noogies!!!!!
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
Until this organization becomes more Christ like,,, it never deserves to have anything ""Christ"" in its name.
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
Anything involving Christian should not be included with Jehovah or Jehovah's witness's.
They are not Christian nor Christ like.
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
"Srtuth?"
Yeah. That would be a good one!!
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
No possible way the invented name "Jehovah" can go away,,, without the Borg collapsing in on itself like a bunch of tinder dry bamboo,, burning and disappear "like smoke".
That name can never disappear to their theology.
Culty.
this was posted on jw leaks.. my truth's | dad seeking truth.
.
.
Which is why they can't 'apologize'.
It would blow the lid off the Borg.
Resulting in a tsunami of "doubters or faders"
A PIMO revolution. Schism.
let's be honest, there's a stigma to the name jehovah's witness.
if they are going more mainstream.
i imagine the first recommendation was a name change.
Rutherford made a sect of it all.
We can see a "distancing" of this horse shit in recent times.
Like that if beards.
Which boozerford despised.